Make the data hard
Write assessment pass into the SLA
Make energy-carbon governance provable, reviewable and wagerable. MeetCarbon OS and Solacred’s zero-carbon engineering packs, as a consortium, jointly commit to three layers of results — economic savings, policy compliance and abatement — with stepped compensation if missed. The customer pays for results, not things, hours or software.
What public institutions fear most is not lack of effort
It is “we worked for years and still cannot explain it at the critical moment”. Three forces amplify that in this period.
Tight budgets
Efficiency retrofits and PV-storage-charging often need millions to tens of millions up front, plus ongoing platform build and O&M. Fiscal budgets are tight and special-fund cycles are long. The old “large fiscal budget + one-shot tender + project delivery” model no longer matches how public institutions actually spend.
Hard assessments
Annual evaluation, conservation-oriented office programmes, efficiency grading and filing targets interlock. “Data that can be verified” is now a hard constraint — manual reporting and Excel roll-ups cannot produce a traceable lineage and original vouchers at third-party verification.
Scattered responsibility
One energy-carbon project signs three to five separate contracts: A does HVAC, B does PV, C does the platform, D does O&M. Each signed and delivered to their contract. Nobody is responsible for whether the customer actually passes the assessment.
RaaS vs traditional models: put “results” in the contract subject
Traditional models each own one piece of the puzzle. RaaS hands the final picture to the consortium.
| EMC | SaaS | EPC | RaaS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What you pay for | Share of saved energy cost | Software subscription | Engineering settlement | Three-dimension result KPIs (economic + compliance + abatement) |
| Scope of commitment | Economic results only | Software availability only | Engineering completion only | Every result the customer can take away |
| Who holds the risk | ESCO holds savings risk | Customer holds use-effect risk | Customer holds operating risk | Consortium jointly holds three-layer result risk |
| Tied to assessment | Not tied | Not tied | Not tied | Tied to provincial comprehensive evaluation |
| Missed-target compensation | None | None | None | Stepped compensation (remediate → deduct → refund → renewal offset) |
| Customer upfront outlay | Low | Medium | High | Zero or low (pay by results, in instalments) |
一句话：RaaS = EMC（经济）+ SaaS（数据）+ EPC（建设）的总责任打包，由联合体单线对接。
Two parties, one result chain
MeetCarbon makes the data speak; Solacred makes the physics come down. The customer has one consortium coordinator — no “who do I call”.
- MeetCarbon OS data base
- JS/T 303 / GB/T 46563 accounting
- Dual-carbon verification cabin
- Atan AI
- Efficiency retrofits and PV-storage-charging
- Long-term hosted O&M SLA
- VPP aggregation
- Carbon-asset operations on behalf
Three layers in parallel; missing any one triggers compensation
Economic results + compliance results + abatement outcomes form one annual wager annex, third-party verified.
The value customers feel most, and the layer closest to classic EMC. Beyond saved energy cost, RaaS also wagers VPP and carbon-asset upside as incremental results.
| KPI | 计量口径 | 承诺范围 | 频率 | 第三方核证 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall energy-savings rate | (baseline energy − current energy) / baseline energy | Offices ≥15–25% / schools ≥18–28% / hospitals ≥8–15% / venues ≥20–30% | Annual | Third-party energy-audit body |
| Year-on-year energy-cost cut | Year-on-year after stripping price effects | ≥ 12–20% | Quarterly / annual | Consortium + customer finance joint check |
| Annual incremental VPP returns | Demand response + ancillary services + load-side spot | ≥ CNY 0.5–3 / m² / year | Annual | Power-exchange settlement statements |
| Annual incremental carbon-asset returns | CCER + carbon benefit + green-power offtake proof | One-to-one by resource potential | Annual | Registry-issued certificates |
Stepped compensation: review first, then deduct, then refund
Avoid a one-shot refund that raises the consortium’s exit incentive and hurts the customer’s long-term interest. The customer may terminate at any stage.
Platform and scene: clear split, combined duty
MeetCarbon owns data self-proof; Solacred owns physical abatement. To the customer there is one consortium.
MeetCarbon OS data-base SLA
Unify organisation, projects, assets, metering points, collection frequency and data owners; connect electricity, gas, heat, water, PV, storage, charging/swapping, buildings and O&M into a traceable data chain and a unified data asset.
- Monthly platform availability ≥ 99.5%
- Key metering-point collection success ≥ 98%
- Real-time ingest latency ≤ 5 minutes
Carbon accounting and efficiency-grading methodology commitment
The accounting engine is pre-set to JS/T 303 and the Public-Institution Carbon Accounting Guidelines; efficiency grading is modular per GB/T 46563—2025. When national methodology changes, MeetCarbon re-runs — the customer does not redo the work.
- Full Scope 1+2, optional Scope 3
- Configurable factor library + automatic re-run
- Historical versions kept so outward disclosure stays stable
Dual-carbon verification cabin: one-click pack at assessment time
Archive logic is pre-set in system and O&M: engineering ledgers, run logs, remediation records and third-party packs. One-click packs for annual evaluation, conservation-oriented office programmes and third-party verification.
- One-click pack by project / area / time / owner
- Assessment bounce-back caused by the platform is compensated per contract
- Connect NGAO information platform and local carbon hubs
Atan AI commitment
Free people from repeated calculation and experience-only judgement. AI does not replace human judgement; it automates the “cannot calculate, too slow, cannot finish writing” part.
- Energy-use forecast monthly MAPE ≤ 8%
- Anomaly-alert accuracy ≥ 85%
- AI-generated content for formal disclosure must pass human review
Efficiency retrofit and PV-storage-charging construction commitment
Based on seven engineering packs accumulated over years (A rooftop PV / B central HVAC and lighting / C steam-boiler heat-pump replacement / D envelope and fresh air / E storage and microgrid / F smart use and metering / G green power and carbon-benefit procurement). If the savings rate is missed, we top up ourselves — no extra charge to the customer.
- Packs A–G composed flexibly
- Baseline + metering boundary + algorithm + acceptance in one go
- In-warranty repair + performance-decay compensation
Long-term hosted O&M SLA
5–10 year hosting, professional ops + on-site engineers + remote support, three-level response. Monthly review + quarterly books + annual result proof. Any SLA miss is compensated as agreed.
- Major on-site faults: on site in 4 hours
- Remote anomaly alerts: respond within 30 minutes
- Monthly ops report by the 5th working day of the next month
VPP and carbon-asset operations: incremental-return commitment
In Wuchang, about 115 public institutions are already on energy-cost hosting plus VPP aggregation — “hosting cuts cost + market upside + office demonstration” in one loop. VPP returns are guaranteed from the bottom, taken from market revenue share; the customer needs no extra budget.
- Annual VPP return floor, no cap on the upside
- CCER / carbon benefit / green-power offtake filed on behalf
- No extra service fee
EMC upgraded to “floor + share + wager”
Classic EMC is “share whatever you save”. RaaS adds “if it is not saved, the consortium compensates”. The long term pushes retrofit design, equipment choice and O&M spend to a finer grain.
- Year-1 savings-rate floor
- From year 2, misses are technically topped up by the consortium
- Repeated misses trigger stepped compensation
Every step locks evidence for later KPI wagers
Based on the white-paper five-stage path, each stage’s process deliverable is rewritten as input evidence for the result wager.
- ·Baseline audit report
- ·Three-layer KPI sandbox
- ·Commercial-model proposal
- ·Baseline confirmation (both parties signed)
- ·Efficiency-retrofit and PV-storage-charging completion packs
- ·Platform access spec and interface list
- ·Master data and data dictionary
- ·First data-quality report
- ·Accounting-logic note + factor list
- ·Monitoring boards and alert config
- ·Trial-run report and calibration records
- ·Report list and samples
- ·Upper/regional platform interface note
- ·First dual-carbon verification cabin
- ·Mock-verification records
- ·AI scene notes and user guide
- ·AI-effect evaluation report
- ·Monthly/quarterly ops reports
- ·Annual three-layer result proof
Commitments configured one-to-one by typology
Typologies differ sharply in energy-system structure, flexible-load scale, retrofit room and assessment requirements.
Prefecture/district compounds, provincial agencies, central-SOE HQ parks
Heavy annual-evaluation pressure, demonstration-programme load, savings concentrated in HVAC and lighting
Pack B (central HVAC and lighting) + Pack A (rooftop/carport PV) + Pack F (smart use and metering) + EMC + full MeetCarbon OS
The road already walked: real MeetCarbon × Solacred samples
RaaS is not a new invention — it recombines chains already running, under a result-wager logic.
About 115 public institutions on energy-cost hosting + VPP
EMC covers public institutions in the jurisdiction, and HVAC, lighting and charging flexible load is aggregated into a VPP in a compliant way. EMC + VPP revenue-share is live with the zero-carbon office and VPP management modules.
- Hosting cuts cost + market upside + office demonstration
- Compliant flexible-load aggregation
- EMC + VPP commercial loop already running
Wuhan / Wuchang energy-carbon supervision and service system
With China Construction Eighth Engineering Division and others, built a district carbon-supervision platform taking on dual-control allocation, key-unit monitoring, energy-conservation review and project carbon evaluation, inspection filings — connected to Smart Wuchang, the local carbon hub and municipal monitoring.
- District supervision platform on-prem
- Four-level data continuity
- A template for city-level RaaS supervision packs
Hubei University of Economics / Hubei University of Science and Technology energy hosting + zero-carbon campus
Distributed PV + energy-cost hosting + zero-carbon campus management: campus energy governance, green-campus construction and carbon-benefit education. Multi-campus EMC + invest-build-operate (PV) is live.
- Invest-build-operate (PV)
- Multi-campus aggregation
- Replicable to other universities
Wuchang District zero-carbon campus, district-wide rollout
From a single-site zero-carbon campus to a district education-bureau rollout, a standard template of “1 zero-carbon campus management system + 1 green-energy base + N low-carbon micro-scenes” covering energy monitoring, PV O&M, carbon accounts, low-carbon education and demonstration filing.
- Standard “1+1+N” template
- District education-bureau batch copy
- Demonstration filing and brand output
四步启动：从 0 到长期同行
Make energy-carbon governance provable, reviewable and wagerable — the same sentence MeetCarbon and Solacred deliver to customers.
The consortium provides a free on-site survey: current energy use, first savings potential, platform-data status, assessment-requirement alignment.
Pick one building, one campus or one independent unit for a POC; the consortium funds engineering and platform deploy and verifies against contracted KPIs.
After the POC shows KPIs are reachable, sign the master service contract + three-party governance + year-1 wager annex; year-end acceptance against three-layer KPIs.
Enter long-term hosting; annual rolling reviews; the annual wager annex can be re-negotiated as the customer’s business changes.
Hand “results” to a consortium willing to carry them
If results are missed, we carry them together; if they are hit, we talk share.
Start planning at least 6 months before the provincial comprehensive-evaluation node.