One indicator set, many frameworks, with evidence back to the source
MeetCarbon Cloud ESG keeps material topics, the indicator library, collection and review, disclosure indexes and audit actions on one chain. Environmental figures prefer energy and GHG-inventory results. Social and governance items are collected by task. The same numbers can be indexed against more than one framework, with gaps shown.
- 15
- workspace entries
- 5
- frameworks for indexing
- E·S·G
- environment, social, governance
- Multi-entity
- group and subsidiary roll-up
- Scope 2 electricity · 3 subsidiaries not reviewedOverdue
- Supply-chain security · no annual indicatorGap
- East China supplier A · environmental penalty to reviewHigh risk
From topics to a report you can audit
Five stages match modules in the product. Once topics are set, indicators, collection, indexes and remediation follow the same organisation and year.
- 01
Topics
Screen topics by double materiality. Financial and impact materiality are scored separately, with evidence.
Materiality - 02
Indicators
Attach topics to the indicator tree: organisation, frequency, definition and disclosure line.
Indicators · Performance - 03
Collect
Energy-carbon figures sync in. Social and governance indicators go out as reviewed tasks.
Collection · Supply chain - 04
Disclose
Build a compliance index by framework. Sections bind to indicators and attachments. Versions stay readable.
Reporting - 05
Govern
Audit findings, management-review decisions and the risk register stay open until they close.
Audit · Review · Risk
What you see in the ESG workspace
The menu follows the product. Open any module to see its tabs and the work it actually does.
Cockpit
Strategy and performanceFor group and multi-region admins: overall score, E/S/G split, and overdue collection or indicator gaps by reporting year, region and project.
- Overall score plus environment, social and governance
- Region and project filters
- To-do list: overdue tasks, gaps, high-risk suppliers
Screens are structural samples. Scores and names are not a client’s actual disclosure.
Environment, social and governance, each with a definition
These are indicators the workspace commonly carries. Unit and source sit on the indicator, so the report year does not invent a second environmental total.
Environment
Prefer annual results from energy management and the GHG inventory. ESG keeps the definition and the disclosure map.
- tCO₂eGHG Scope 1 and Scope 2Annual GHG inventory
- tceTotal energy useEMS roll-up
- tCO₂e / revenueEmission intensityInventory ÷ reported denominator
- %Clean-energy shareEnergy breakdown
Social
Workforce and supply-chain indicators are collected by task, submitted by the owner and posted after review.
- %Employee turnoverHR submission
- countSafety incidentsEHS submission
- %Supplier ESG coverageSupplier records
- hours / personTraining hoursTraining submission
Governance
Governance indicators connect to internal audit and the risk register. The report cites items that are closed or still tracked.
- times / yearBoard oversight of sustainabilityGovernance submission
- %Anti-corruption training coverageCompliance submission
- %Audit-finding close rateInternal audit
- itemsOpen material risksRisk register
12 sample indicators — the library can growScope 3, product carbon footprint and allowance ledgers are calculated in neighbouring products. ESG cites the roll-up and does not run a second engine.
Each role opens the workspace to answer one question
The same data, different to-do lists for the lead, the contributor, the auditor and the advisor.
Which clauses are still open, and which team is holding them?
- Cockpit to-dos
- Index gaps
- Overdue tasks
- High-risk suppliers
One indicator set, gaps against each framework
Switch frameworks to see the topics they ask for, and whether the sample indicators are mapped. The product produces the index and the gaps. Narrative is still written by the project team.
Reports follow double materiality and four elements: governance, strategy, risk and opportunity management, metrics and targets.
- Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHGMapped
- Total energy useMapped
- Employee turnoverMapped
- Supplier ESG coverageMapped
The index shows whether a clause already has an indicator and an attachment. Scenario analysis and transition narrative are written by the project team, not auto-drafted.
Framework text follows the official release. Mappings are versioned, so a standards update upgrades the version without rebuilding the indicator library.
Collection is reviewed. Audit findings are closed.
Numbers that come in keep a trail. Findings that go out need evidence to close. Both chains sit on the same reporting year.
- 1AssignCreate tasks by indicator, organisation and due date.
- 2Enter or syncEnergy uses a roll-up sync. Other items are entered online.
- 3Review trailReturns, edits and approvals stay on the task, with attachments.
- 4Into the reportOnly approved values can be cited by the index and sections.
- 1FindingInternal audit records nonconformities against a checklist.
- 2RemediateName an owner, a due date and the action.
- 3CloseClose with evidence. Open items stay on the cockpit.
- 4Review follow-upManagement-review decisions stay tracked until done.
Cite environmental totals. Collect social and governance by task.
The ESG workspace consumes annual roll-ups from neighbouring systems, and accepts submissions, documents and supplier collaboration. The calculation engines stay where they are.
- Allowances, CCER ledgers and surrender sit in carbon assets
- Organisational GHG accounting and verification papers sit in the inventory
- Product carbon-footprint models sit in PCF
- Site metering and electrical safety sit in EMS
CDP-style questionnaires, climate-scenario calculations and use-of-proceeds tracking do not have their own pages yet. When needed, they are carried by indicators, attachments and advisory delivery.
Five steps to a first index
Set the boundary, the framework and the owners, then send tasks. Index gaps show what is missing before every number is in.
- 1Reporting year and organisational boundary
- 2Frameworks and versions in scope
- 3Topic owners and contributors
- 4Existing energy and inventory year-end results
A first-year project usually covers mandatory and climate-related clauses first. Other topics follow the materiality conclusion in batches.
- 1
Boundary and framework
Choose the reporting entity, consolidation scope and framework versions for the year.
OutputReport project - 2
Score topics
Finish double-materiality scoring and lock the topics in the report.
OutputTopic list - 3
Indicators to owners
For each topic, set the indicator, definition, frequency and owning organisation.
OutputIndicator tree - 4
Send collection
Sync energy and inventory totals. Other indicators become tasks.
OutputCollection tasks - 5
Index and papers
Build the clause index, mark coverage and gaps, and attach files to indicators.
OutputIndex and gaps
Multi-entity, versions and working papers in one tenant
A group can roll up subsidiaries. A framework upgrade keeps the previous mapping. Exports go to auditors and the exchange filing.
Multi-entity
Group, subsidiaries and regions submit separately. Roll-up rules sit on the indicator.
Framework versions
Guidelines are versioned. A published report still points at the clauses of its year.
Evidence chain
Values, edit history, review comments and attachments open in one path.
Export
Index, indicator detail and the attachment list export for disclosure and audit.
Access
Leads, contributors, reviewers and advisors are granted by module.
Reporting year
Cockpit, tasks and reports lock to the same year.
How neighbouring products divide the work
ESG cites their annual results. Accounting, trading and site metering stay in the original system.
The duty changes. The workspace stays the same.
What changes is the framework version, the topic pack and who fills the tasks. These five are the uses we see most.
Settle the boundary first
How do ESG and the GHG inventory divide the work?
The inventory owns organisational GHG accounting, review and verification papers. ESG cites the annual totals inside indicators, the index and the report. It does not recalculate emissions.
How do this page and the ESG advisory page divide the work?
This page describes modules already in the workspace: topics, indicators, collection, indexes, internal audit and advisory projects. The advisory page describes how advisors work through materiality, framework mapping and report drafting. They are used together.
What happens when an exchange or standard is updated?
Frameworks are configured by version. A new reporting year uses the new clauses. A report already published still points at the version and mapping of its year.
Where do social and governance figures come from?
Owning teams submit them in collection tasks, or a system pushes them through an API. They post after review. Environmental items prefer a sync from energy management and the inventory.
How are external ratings maintained?
The ratings module stores results, controversies and improvement items issued by the rating agency. The product does not simulate a score and does not publish ratings on the agency’s behalf.
Can CDP questionnaires and climate scenarios be generated automatically?
A questionnaire engine and scenario calculation do not have their own pages yet. Related figures are carried by indicators and attachments. Narrative and modelling are delivered by the project team or advisory work.
Lay out this year’s framework and the gaps
Tell us the listing venue, the reporting year and how the organisation is structured. We will walk the cockpit, the index and the collection tasks against your framework.